[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c2280ea-27dc-667f-78b4-e7eaaf97d337@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 12:28:42 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@...il.com>
To: Andrew <nitr0@...i.kr.ua>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel panic in eth_header
On 02/05/2019 12:21 PM, Andrew wrote:
> I think that backport will be trivial - at least patch lays smoothly on 4.9 (just with offsets difference).
>
> I'll test it.
>
> Btw, maybe there's a some test conditions to quickly check if patch helps? Crash is reproducible with unpredictable interval (tens of hours of quite heavy load).
>
Build your kernel with CONFIG_KASAN=y
Then run the tests Peter wrote.
4c3510483d26420d2c2c7cc075ad872286cc5932 selftests: net: ip_defrag: cover new IPv6 defrag behavior
3271a4821882a64214acc1bd7b173900ec70c9bf selftests: net: fix/improve ip_defrag selftest
bccc17118bcf3c62c947361d51760334f6602f43 selftests/net: add ipv6 tests to ip_defrag selftest
02c7f38b7ace9f1b2ddb7a88139127eef4cf8706 selftests/net: add ip_defrag selftest
Powered by blists - more mailing lists