[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2061891.QOleSDBFsG@debian64>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 23:12:45 +0100
From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] net: dsa: qca8k: implement DT-based ports <-> phy translation
On Tuesday, February 5, 2019 10:29:34 PM CET Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > For now, I added the DT binding update to the patch as well.
> > But if this is indeed the way to go, it'll get a separate patch.
>
> Hi Christian
>
> You need to be careful with the DT binding. You need to keep backwards
> compatible with it. An old DT blob needs to keep working. I don't
> think this is true with this change.
Do you mean because of the
- switch0@0 {
+ switch@10 {
compatible = "qca,qca8337";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
- reg = <0>;
+ reg = <0x10>;
change?
or because I removed the phy-handles?
The reg = <0x10>; will be necessary regardless. Because this
is really a bug in the existing binding example and if it is
copied it will prevent the qca8k driver from loading.
This is due to a resource conflict, because there will be
already a "phy_port1: phy@0" registered at reg = <0>;
So this never worked would have worked.
Regards,
Christian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists