netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v7 0/8] devlink: Add configuration parameters support for devlink

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190204185626.3c7a162b@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Feb 2019 18:56:26 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Vasundhara Volam <vasundhara-v.volam@...adcom.com>
Cc:     Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "michael.chan@...adcom.com" <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 0/8] devlink: Add configuration parameters
 support for devlink_port

On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 12:25:13 +0530, Vasundhara Volam wrote:
> > > IMHO this is not really a problem. We can either use an additional flag
> > > telling kernel/driver if we are setting runtime or persistent WoL mask
> > > or we can pass (up to) two bitmaps.  
> Jakub, I will add another two bitmask parameters for WoL named as
> wake_on_lan_runtime
> and wake_on_lan_persistent. This will give information about what
> types are runtime and
> what types are persistent, does the device support for any given WoL types.
> 
> Does that sound good?

No?  We were talking about using the soon-too-come ethtool netlink
API with additional indication that given configuration request is
supposed to be persisted.  Adding more devlink parameters is exactly 
the opposite of what you should be doing.