[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190205093530.GA2133@nanopsycho>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 10:35:30 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 04/16] net: sched: traverse chains in block
with tcf_get_next_chain()
Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 01:32:49PM CET, vladbu@...lanox.com wrote:
>All users of block->chain_list rely on rtnl lock and assume that no new
>chains are added when traversing the list. Use tcf_get_next_chain() to
>traverse chain list without relying on rtnl mutex. This function iterates
>over chains by taking reference to current iterator chain only and doesn't
>assume external synchronization of chain list.
>
>Don't take reference to all chains in block when flushing and use
>tcf_get_next_chain() to safely iterate over chain list instead. Remove
>tcf_block_put_all_chains() that is no longer used.
>
>Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists