[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d1cb0d4-c781-3063-49f5-ce788f141b9f@iogearbox.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 17:05:46 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: bjorn.topel@...il.com, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
ast@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: palmer@...ive.com, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] Add RISC-V (RV64G) BPF JIT
On 02/05/2019 01:41 PM, bjorn.topel@...il.com wrote:
> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
>
> Hi!
>
> This v2 series adds an RV64G BPF JIT to the kernel.
>
> At the moment the RISC-V Linux port does not support
> CONFIG_HAVE_KPROBES (Patrick Stählin sent out an RFC last year), which
> means that CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS is not supported. Thus, no tests
> involving BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT,
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE and BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT passes.
>
> The implementation does not support "far branching" (>4KiB).
>
> Test results:
> # modprobe test_bpf
> test_bpf: Summary: 378 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [366/366 JIT'ed]
>
> # echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled
> # ./test_verifier
> ...
> Summary: 761 PASSED, 507 SKIPPED, 2 FAILED
>
> Note that "test_verifier" was run with one build with
> CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS=y and one without, otherwise
> many of the the tests that require unaligned access were skipped.
>
> CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS=y:
> # echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled
> # ./test_verifier | grep -c 'NOTE.*unknown align'
> 0
>
> No CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS:
> # echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled
> # ./test_verifier | grep -c 'NOTE.*unknown align'
> 59
>
> The two failing test_verifier tests are:
> "ld_abs: vlan + abs, test 1"
> "ld_abs: jump around ld_abs"
>
> This is due to that "far branching" involved in those tests.
> All tests where done on QEMU emulator version 3.1.50
> (v3.1.0-688-g8ae951fbc106). I'll test it on real hardware, when I get
> access to it.
>
> I'm routing this patch via bpf-next/netdev mailing list (after a
> conversation with Palmer at FOSDEM), mainly because the other JITs
> went that path.
>
> Again, thanks for all the comments!
>
> Cheers,
> Björn
>
> v1 -> v2:
> * Added JMP32 support. (Daniel)
> * Add RISC-V to Documentation/sysctl/net.txt. (Daniel)
> * Fixed seen_call() asymmetry. (Daniel)
> * Fixed broken bpf_flush_icache() range. (Daniel)
> * Added alignment annotations to some selftests.
>
> RFCv1 -> v1:
> * Cleaned up the Kconfig and net/Makefile. (Christoph)
> * Removed the entry-stub and squashed the build/config changes to be
> part of the JIT implementation. (Christoph)
> * Simplified the register tracking code. (Daniel)
> * Removed unused macros. (Daniel)
> * Added myself as maintainer and updated documentation. (Daniel)
> * Removed HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS. (Christoph, Palmer)
> * Added tail-calls and cleaned up the code.
>
>
> Björn Töpel (4):
> bpf, riscv: add BPF JIT for RV64G
> MAINTAINERS: add RISC-V BPF JIT maintainer
> bpf, doc: add RISC-V JIT to BPF documentation
> selftests/bpf: add "any alignment" annotation for some tests
>
> Documentation/networking/filter.txt | 16 +-
> Documentation/sysctl/net.txt | 1 +
> MAINTAINERS | 6 +
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/riscv/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/riscv/net/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 1602 +++++++++++++++++
> .../selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c | 1 +
> .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c | 22 +
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jset.c | 2 +
> .../selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c | 1 +
> .../selftests/bpf/verifier/spin_lock.c | 2 +
> .../selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c | 4 +
> 14 files changed, 1654 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/net/Makefile
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists