[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190206124307.GA18410@unicorn.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 13:43:07 +0100
From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, linville@...driver.com,
Nicholas Nunley <nicholas.d.nunley@...el.com>,
nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] ethtool: introduce new ioctl for per-queue
settings
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 04:01:03PM -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> +static int do_perqueue(struct cmd_context *ctx)
> +{
> + __u32 queue_mask[__KERNEL_DIV_ROUND_UP(MAX_NUM_QUEUE, 32)] = {0};
> + int i, n_queues = 0;
> +
> + if (ctx->argc == 0)
> + exit_bad_args();
> +
> + /*
> + * The sub commands will be applied to
> + * all queues if no queue_mask set
> + */
> + if (strncmp(*ctx->argp, "queue_mask", 10)) {
This would match any string starting with "queue_mask", is it intended?
> + n_queues = find_max_num_queues(ctx);
> + if (n_queues < 0) {
> + perror("Cannot get number of queues");
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> + for (i = 0; i < n_queues / 32; i++)
> + queue_mask[i] = ~0;
> + queue_mask[i] = (1 << (n_queues - i * 32)) - 1;
It's unlikely today, I guess, but in theory, this would overflow if
n_queues == MAX_NUM_QUEUE
> + fprintf(stdout,
> + "The sub commands will be applied to all %d queues\n",
> + n_queues);
> + } else {
> + ctx->argc--;
> + ctx->argp++;
> + n_queues = set_queue_mask(queue_mask, *ctx->argp);
> + if (n_queues < 0) {
> + perror("Invalid queue mask");
> + return n_queues;
> + }
> + ctx->argc--;
> + ctx->argp++;
> + }
> +
> + i = find_option(ctx->argc, ctx->argp);
> + if (i < 0)
> + exit_bad_args();
> +
> + /* no sub_command support yet */
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Michal Kubecek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists