lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a24778f-9fc3-6edc-5d74-d152a95d5a98@microchip.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Feb 2019 17:51:33 +0000
From:   <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>
To:     <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
        <sre@...nel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] ARM: at91/dt: update to existing drivers for the
 sam9x60 SoC

All,

On 16/01/2019 at 10:57, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This series collects some little modifications to DT bindings and associated
> drivers changes for supporting the upcoming SAM9X60 SoC.
> 
> I took the advantage of this series for fixing some of the leftovers in DT
> bindings for reset controller and Ethernet macb.
> 
> These changes touch several sub-systems but I would like that these (mostly
> trivial) patches stay together for facilitating reviews, prevent breaking
> dependencies and facilitating the tracking of acceptance status. However, tell
> me if you think otherwise.

It seems it's not the preferred way to go and that I must split and send 
to sub-system Maintainers so that bindings and driver code go together 
through Maintainer's git trees (USB, power/reset, netdev).

> My intentions are that the series would enter Mainline through arm-soc tree:
> sounds okay to everyone? If okay, I'm ready to collect Ack tags...

I'm re-sending this split series. Some of the "Reviewed-by:" are missing 
so we'll have the chance to add them on individual series.

Thanks for your reviews so far.

Best regards,
   Nicolas


> For the first batch, I send the whole series to everyone. I'll try my best to
> reduce subsequent message deliveries if one part of the serries needs rework.
> 
> Best regards,
>    Nicolas
> 
> 
> Nicolas Ferre (8):
>    dt-bindings: arm: atmel: add missing samx7 to reset controller
>    dt-bindings: arm: atmel: add new sam9x60 reset controller binding
>    dt-bindings: arm: atmel: add new sam9x60 SFR binding
>    net/macb: bindings doc/trivial: fix documentation for sama5d3 10/100
>      interface
>    net/macb: bindings doc: add sam9x60 binding
>    power: reset: at91-reset: add support for sam9x60 SoC
>    USB: host: ohci-at91: add sam9x60-sfr definition for ohci
>    net: macb: add sam9x60-macb compatibility string
> 
>   .../devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt       |  4 +++-
>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/macb.txt      |  4 ++--
>   drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c            |  1 +
>   drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c                    | 13 +++++++++++++
>   drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c                        |  7 +++++--
>   5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ