netdev - [PATCH net-next 7/7] net/smc: original socket family in inet_sock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu,  7 Feb 2019 15:56:20 +0100
From:   Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
        raspl@...ux.ibm.com, ubraun@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next 7/7] net/smc: original socket family in inet_sock_diag

From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>

Commit ed75986f4aae ("net/smc: ipv6 support for smc_diag.c") changed the
value of the diag_family field. The idea was to indicate the family of
the IP address in the inet_diag_sockid field. But the change makes it
impossible to distinguish an inet_sock_diag response message from SMC
sock_diag response. This patch restores the original behaviour and sends
AF_SMC as value of the diag_family field.

Fixes: ed75986f4aae ("net/smc: ipv6 support for smc_diag.c")
Reported-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 net/smc/smc_diag.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/smc_diag.c b/net/smc/smc_diag.c
index dbf64a93d68a..371b4cf31fcd 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_diag.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_diag.c
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ static void smc_diag_msg_common_fill(struct smc_diag_msg *r, struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct smc_sock *smc = smc_sk(sk);
 
+	r->diag_family = sk->sk_family;
 	if (!smc->clcsock)
 		return;
 	r->id.idiag_sport = htons(smc->clcsock->sk->sk_num);
@@ -45,14 +46,12 @@ static void smc_diag_msg_common_fill(struct smc_diag_msg *r, struct sock *sk)
 	r->id.idiag_if = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
 	sock_diag_save_cookie(sk, r->id.idiag_cookie);
 	if (sk->sk_protocol == SMCPROTO_SMC) {
-		r->diag_family = PF_INET;
 		memset(&r->id.idiag_src, 0, sizeof(r->id.idiag_src));
 		memset(&r->id.idiag_dst, 0, sizeof(r->id.idiag_dst));
 		r->id.idiag_src[0] = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_rcv_saddr;
 		r->id.idiag_dst[0] = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_daddr;
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
 	} else if (sk->sk_protocol == SMCPROTO_SMC6) {
-		r->diag_family = PF_INET6;
 		memcpy(&r->id.idiag_src, &smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr,
 		       sizeof(smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr));
 		memcpy(&r->id.idiag_dst, &smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_daddr,
-- 
2.16.4