lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 15:42:44 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: linux@...linux.org.uk Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sfp: do not probe SFP module before we're attached From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 23:36:51 +0000 > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 03:11:39PM -0800, David Miller wrote: >> From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk> >> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 10:52:30 +0000 >> >> > When we probe a SFP module, we expect to be able to call the upstream >> > device's module_insert() function so that the upstream link can be >> > configured. However, when the upstream device is delayed, we currently >> > may end up probing the module before the upstream device is available, >> > and lose the module_insert() call. >> > >> > Avoid this by holding off probing the module until the SFP bus is >> > properly connected to both the SFP socket driver and the upstream >> > driver. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk> >> >> Applied, thanks Russell. >> >> -stable? > > Yes please. Would you like me to mail the stable team once it hits > mainline? Networking -stable submissions are handled purely by me, so no you don't need to do that. I've queued this one up, thanks. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists