lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <addc4332-bf56-dd86-d70f-5001db5192b0@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2019 20:50:36 +0100 From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: Add support for asking the PHY its abilities On 09.02.2019 20:42, Andrew Lunn wrote: >> I know, it's patch 15 in your series ;) And I'm aware that usually new >> core functionality is acceptable only if it comes together with a user, >> to avoid having billions of orphaned good ideas in the code. >> I focused on the core here to not get lost in all the new stuff, and to >> provide Maxime with some direction for adjusting his series. > > I'm just trying to avoid Maxime reimplementing something when we > already have a patch: > Sure, I didn't mean Maxime should re-implement things we have in the pipe. I meant it more in a way that he gets an idea in which direction we're moving. > https://github.com/lunn/linux/commit/07e3fa8f183f05a09d969a9378534da35238eeb9 > > Maxime, feel free to cherry-pick this into your series. > I'll submit this one too. > Andrew > Heiner Oh, and I just saw: When we talk about/with somebody, we should add him to the mail addressee list.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists