[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190210042414.GH2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 04:24:22 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [RFC] apparently bogus logics in unix_find_other() since 2002
In "net/unix/af_unix.c: Set ATIME on socket inode" (back in
2002) we'd grown something rather odd in unix_find_other(). In the
original patch it was
u=unix_find_socket_byname(sunname, len, type, hash);
- if (!u)
+ if (u) {
+ struct dentry *dentry;
+ dentry = u->protinfo.af_unix.dentry;
+ if (dentry)
+ UPDATE_ATIME(dentry->d_inode);
+ } else
goto fail;
These days the code is
u = unix_find_socket_byname(net, sunname, len, type, hash);
if (u) {
struct dentry *dentry;
dentry = unix_sk(u)->path.dentry;
if (dentry)
touch_atime(&unix_sk(u)->path);
} else
goto fail;
but the logics is the same. It's the abstract address case - we have
'\0' in sunname->sun_path[0]. How in hell could that possibly have
non-NULL ->path.dentry and what would it be?
Note that unix_find_socket_byname() returns non-NULL u here only if
u->addr->name->sun_path[0] is equal to sunname->sun_path[0], i.e.
'\0'. There are only two places where we ever might assign non-NULL
to ->path.dentry:
if (sun_path[0]) {
addr->hash = UNIX_HASH_SIZE;
hash = d_backing_inode(path.dentry)->i_ino & (UNIX_HASH_SIZE - 1);
spin_lock(&unix_table_lock);
u->path = path;
list = &unix_socket_table[hash];
} else {
in unix_bind() (in which case u->addr->name->sun_path[0] will not be '\0') and
/* copy address information from listening to new sock*/
if (otheru->addr) {
refcount_inc(&otheru->addr->refcnt);
newu->addr = otheru->addr;
}
if (otheru->path.dentry) {
path_get(&otheru->path);
newu->path = otheru->path;
}
in unix_stream_connect(). And once ->addr is non-NULL, it's never changed,
and ->addr->name contents is never modified afterwards. So we would have
to had the same condition (non-NULL ->path.dentry with '\0' in
->addr->name->sun_path[0]) at earlier point on the listener socket.
Looks like that should be impossible; what am I missing here? Incidentally,
how can the quoted fragment in in unix_stream_connect() be reached with NULL
otheru->addr? After all, otheru is unix_sock of a listener; how could
we possibly have found it if it had NULL ->addr?
Confused...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists