[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190210124222.59c5d0aa@hermes.lan>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 12:42:22 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Aya Levin <ayal@...lanox.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...lanox.com>,
Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>,
Tal Alon <talal@...lanox.com>,
Ariel Almog <ariela@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 4/4] devlink: add health command support
On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 20:28:49 +0200
Aya Levin <ayal@...lanox.com> wrote:
> +
> +static void cmd_health_help(void)
> +{
> + pr_err("Usage: devlink health show [ dev DEV reporter REPORTER_NAME ]\n");
> + pr_err("Usage: devlink health recover DEV reporter REPORTER_NAME\n");
> + pr_err("Usage: devlink health diagnose DEV reporter REPORTER_NAME\n");
> + pr_err("Usage: devlink health dump show DEV reporter REPORTER_NAME\n");
> + pr_err("Usage: devlink health dump clear DEV reporter REPORTER_NAME\n");
> + pr_err("Usage: devlink health set DEV reporter REPORTER_NAME NAME VALUE\n");
> +}
> +
Minor nit:
I prefer that all code and outputs in iproute2 look the same for ease
of maintenance and constituency of user experience.
Why does devlink not use:
static void cmd_health_help(void)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Usage: devlink health show [ dev DEV reporter REPORTER_NAME ]\n");
fprintf(stderr, " devlink health recover DEV reporter REPORTER_NAME\n");
fprintf(stderr, " devlink health diagnose DEV reporter REPORTER_NAME\n");
...
Or
fprintf(stderr, "Usage: devlink health show [ dev DEV reporter REPORTER_NAME ]\n"
" devlink health recover DEV reporter REPORTER_NAME\n"
" devlink health diagnose DEV reporter REPORTER_NAME\n");
Powered by blists - more mailing lists