[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190211121208.GB12668@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 04:12:08 -0800
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"brouer@...hat.com" <brouer@...hat.com>,
"toke@...hat.com" <toke@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"mgorman@...hsingularity.net" <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] net: page_pool: Don't use page->private to store
dma_addr_t
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 08:53:19AM +0000, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> It's great to use the struct page to store its dma mapping, but I am
> worried about extensibility.
> page_pool is evolving, and it would need several more per-page fields.
> One of them would be pageref_bias, a planned optimization to reduce the
> number of the costly atomic pageref operations (and replace existing
> code in several drivers).
There's space for five words (20 or 40 bytes on 32/64 bit).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists