netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 7/9] net: dsa: Handle SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190211123110.GJ2251@nanopsycho>
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:31:10 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, idosch@...lanox.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, jiri@...lanox.com,
        andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 7/9] net: dsa: Handle
 SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_GET/SET

Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:40:05AM CET, f.fainelli@...il.com wrote:
>Following patches will change the way we communicate getting or setting
>a port's attribute and use a blocking notifier to perform those tasks.
>
>Prepare DSA to support receiving notifier events targeting
>SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_GET/SET and simply translate that into the existing
>dsa_slave_port_attr_{set,get} calls.
>
>Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>---
> net/dsa/slave.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/net/dsa/slave.c b/net/dsa/slave.c
>index 2e5e7c04821b..2a14a38f5f93 100644
>--- a/net/dsa/slave.c
>+++ b/net/dsa/slave.c
>@@ -1558,6 +1558,27 @@ dsa_slave_switchdev_port_obj_event(unsigned long event,
> 	return notifier_from_errno(err);
> }
> 
>+static int
>+dsa_slave_switchdev_port_attr_event(unsigned long event,
>+		struct net_device *netdev,
>+		struct switchdev_notifier_port_attr_info *port_attr_info)
>+{
>+	int err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>+
>+	switch (event) {
>+	case SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET:
>+		err = dsa_slave_port_attr_set(netdev, port_attr_info->attr,
>+					      port_attr_info->trans);
>+		break;
>+	case SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_GET:
>+		err = dsa_slave_port_attr_get(netdev, port_attr_info->attr);
>+		break;
>+	}
>+
>+	port_attr_info->handled = true;
>+	return notifier_from_errno(err);
>+}
>+
> static int dsa_slave_switchdev_blocking_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
> 					      unsigned long event, void *ptr)
> {
>@@ -1570,6 +1591,9 @@ static int dsa_slave_switchdev_blocking_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
> 	case SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD: /* fall through */
> 	case SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_DEL:
> 		return dsa_slave_switchdev_port_obj_event(event, dev, ptr);
>+	case SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET: /* fallthrough */

The case above has "fall through". It would be nice to be consistent.

Anyway:
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>



>+	case SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_GET:
>+		return dsa_slave_switchdev_port_attr_event(event, dev, ptr);
> 	}
> 
> 	return NOTIFY_DONE;
>-- 
>2.19.1
>