[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07a38a20-63d8-a45f-6975-d799d7248f7e@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:36:06 +0800
From: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, David Miller <davem@...hat.com>
CC: <thaller@...hat.com>, <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
<0xeffeff@...il.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <mingfangsen@...wei.com>,
<zhangwenhao8@...wei.com>, <wangxiaogang3@...wei.com>,
<zhoukang7@...wei.com>, <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fix IPv6 prefix route residue
> On 2/3/19 9:04 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>
>> Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2019 14:10:31 +0800
>>
>>> @@ -1165,7 +1165,8 @@ enum cleanup_prefix_rt_t {
>>> list_for_each_entry(ifa, &idev->addr_list, if_list) {
>>> if (ifa == ifp)
>>> continue;
>>> - if (!ipv6_prefix_equal(&ifa->addr, &ifp->addr,
>>> + if (ifa->prefix_len != ifp->prefix_len ||
>>> + !ipv6_prefix_equal(&ifa->addr, &ifp->addr,
>>> ifp->prefix_len))
>>
>> Please fix the indentation of this conditional, it should be:
>>
>> if (ifa->prefix_len != ifp->prefix_len ||
>> !ipv6_prefix_equal(&ifa->addr, &ifp->addr,
>> ifp->prefix_len))
>>
>> Thank you.
Thank you for your suggestion. I have fixed the indentation of the
conditional. In addition, I have used the checkpatch.pl script to check the
patch.
>>
>
> Needs a Fixes tag too.
>
> Fixes: 5b84efecb7d9 ("ipv6 addrconf: don't cleanup prefix route for
> IFA_F_NOPREFIXROUTE")
>
> and cc to that author Thomas Haller <thaller@...hat.com>
>
> .
>
Thank you. The Fixes tag is added in the v2 patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists