netdev - [PATCH net-next v4 02/17] net: sched: protect chain->explicitly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:55:33 +0200
From:   Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
        davem@...emloft.net, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
        Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 02/17] net: sched: protect chain->explicitly_created with block->lock

In order to remove dependency on rtnl lock, protect
tcf_chain->explicitly_created flag with block->lock. Consolidate code that
checks and resets 'explicitly_created' flag into __tcf_chain_put() to
execute it atomically with rest of code that puts chain reference.

Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
---
 net/sched/cls_api.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
index 806e7158a7e8..2ebf8e53038a 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
@@ -370,13 +370,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcf_chain_get_by_act);
 
 static void tc_chain_tmplt_del(struct tcf_chain *chain);
 
-static void __tcf_chain_put(struct tcf_chain *chain, bool by_act)
+static void __tcf_chain_put(struct tcf_chain *chain, bool by_act,
+			    bool explicitly_created)
 {
 	struct tcf_block *block = chain->block;
 	bool is_last, free_block = false;
 	unsigned int refcnt;
 
 	mutex_lock(&block->lock);
+	if (explicitly_created) {
+		if (!chain->explicitly_created) {
+			mutex_unlock(&block->lock);
+			return;
+		}
+		chain->explicitly_created = false;
+	}
+
 	if (by_act)
 		chain->action_refcnt--;
 
@@ -402,19 +411,18 @@ static void __tcf_chain_put(struct tcf_chain *chain, bool by_act)
 
 static void tcf_chain_put(struct tcf_chain *chain)
 {
-	__tcf_chain_put(chain, false);
+	__tcf_chain_put(chain, false, false);
 }
 
 void tcf_chain_put_by_act(struct tcf_chain *chain)
 {
-	__tcf_chain_put(chain, true);
+	__tcf_chain_put(chain, true, false);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcf_chain_put_by_act);
 
 static void tcf_chain_put_explicitly_created(struct tcf_chain *chain)
 {
-	if (chain->explicitly_created)
-		tcf_chain_put(chain);
+	__tcf_chain_put(chain, false, true);
 }
 
 static void tcf_chain_flush(struct tcf_chain *chain)
@@ -2305,7 +2313,6 @@ static int tc_ctl_chain(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *n,
 		 * to the chain previously taken during addition.
 		 */
 		tcf_chain_put_explicitly_created(chain);
-		chain->explicitly_created = false;
 		break;
 	case RTM_GETCHAIN:
 		err = tc_chain_notify(chain, skb, n->nlmsg_seq,
-- 
2.13.6