netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests: bpf: centre kernel bpf objects under new subdir "kern

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:47:52 +0000
From:   Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests: bpf: centre kernel bpf objects
 under new subdir "kern_progs"


> On 11 Feb 2019, at 04:06, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 05:41:21PM +0000, Jiong Wang wrote:
>> At the moment, all kernel bpf objects are listed under BPF_OBJ_FILES.
>> Listing them manually sometimes causing patch conflict when people are
>> adding new testcases simultaneously.
>> 
>> It is better to centre all the related source files under a subdir
>> "kern_progs", then auto-generate the object file list.
>> 
>> Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile               | 26 +++++-----------------
>> .../selftests/bpf/{ => kern_progs}/bpf_flow.c      |  0
>> .../selftests/bpf/{ => kern_progs}/connect4_prog.c |  0
>> .../selftests/bpf/{ => kern_progs}/connect6_prog.c |  0
>> .../selftests/bpf/{ => kern_progs}/dev_cgroup.c    |  0
> 
> Thanks a lot for the patch.
> A tiny bit of bikeshedding...
> 'kern_progs' feels a bit too long and awkward to type.
> May be just 'progs’ ?

Ack, will do the change in v2.

Regards,
Jiong