netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Remove getting SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6ff1b9c2-1206-f568-8556-28efe852dd08@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Feb 2019 09:54:24 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, idosch@...lanox.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, jiri@...lanox.com,
        andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Remove getting
 SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS

On 2/12/19 9:50 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:17:46 -0800
> 
>> AFAICT there is no code that attempts to get the value of the attribute
>> SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS while it is used with
>> switchdev_port_attr_set().
>>
>> This is effectively no doing anything and it can slow down future work
>> that tries to make modifications in these areas so remove that.
> 
> Series applied.
> 
>> David, there should be no dependency with previous patch series, but
>> again, feedback from Ido and Jiri would be welcome in case this was
>> added for a reason.
> 
> Ok, is there going to be another respin of that switchdev_ops removal
> series?

Yes, I will be working on a v5 which addresses Ido's feedback in the
next hours.
-- 
Florian