netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] selftests: bpf: improve bpf object file rules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190212043442.qnnzk2zdcjalpfto@ast-mbp>
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 20:34:44 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
Cc:     daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] selftests: bpf: improve bpf object file
 rules

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:01:17PM +0000, Jiong Wang wrote:
> This set improves bpf object file related rules in selftests Makefile.
>   - tell git to ignore the build dir "alu32".
>   - extend sub-register mode compilation to all bpf object files to give
>     LLVM compiler bpf back-end more exercise.
>   - auto-generate bpf kernel object file list.
>   - relax sub-register mode compilation criteria.
> 
> v1 -> v2:
>   - rename "kern_progs" to "progs". (Alexei)
>   - spin a new patch to remove build server kernel requirement for
>     sub-register mode compilation (Alexei)
>   - rebase on top of KaFai’s latest "test_sock_fields" patch set.

Looks great. Both test_progs and test_progs_32 are passing for me.
Applied to bpf-next. Thanks!