[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84c8ed42-2a7a-6d8b-2354-3f64098a9ff0@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 15:43:10 +0800
From: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>, <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
<0xeffeff@...il.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <mingfangsen@...wei.com>,
<zhangwenhao8@...wei.com>, <wangxiaogang3@...wei.com>,
<zhoukang7@...wei.com>, <dsahern@...il.com>, <thaller@...hat.com>,
<maowenan@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: fix IPv6 prefix route residue
> From: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>
> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:57:46 +0800
>
>> From: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>
>>
>> Follow those steps:
>> # ip addr add 2001:123::1/32 dev eth0
>> # ip addr add 2001:123:456::2/64 dev eth0
>> # ip addr del 2001:123::1/32 dev eth0
>> # ip addr del 2001:123:456::2/64 dev eth0
>> and then prefix route of 2001:123::1/32 will still exist.
>>
>> This is because ipv6_prefix_equal in check_cleanup_prefix_route
>> func does not check whether two IPv6 addresses have the same
>> prefix length. If the prefix of one address starts with another
>> shorter address prefix, even though their prefix lengths are
>> different, the return value of ipv6_prefix_equal is true.
>>
>> Here I add a check of whether two addresses have the same prefix
>> to decide whether their prefixes are equal.
>>
>> Fixes: 5b84efecb7d9 ("ipv6 addrconf: don't cleanup prefix route
>> for IFA_F_NOPREFIXROUTE")
>> Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>
>> Reported-by: Wenhao Zhang <zhangwenhao8@...wei.com>
>
> Applied and queued up for -stable.Thank you for applying the patch.
>
> Please do not split up long Fixes: tag lines, keep the entire tag on
> one line only.
>
> I fixed it up for you this time.
>
> Thanks.
This is the first patch in my life. Thank you and David Ahern again.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists