lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <a264c48823687434e4d18aeb5830707e00c64250.1550077162.git.joabreu@synopsys.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Feb 2019 18:00:43 +0100
From:   Jose Abreu <jose.abreu@...opsys.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jose Abreu <jose.abreu@...opsys.com>,
        Joao Pinto <joao.pinto@...opsys.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Subject: [PATCH net] net: stmmac: Fix NAPI poll in TX path when in multi-queue

Commit 8fce33317023 introduced the concept of NAPI per-channel and
independent cleaning of TX path.

This is currently breaking performance in some cases. The scenario
happens when all packets are being received in Queue 0 but the TX is
performed in Queue != 0.

I didn't look very deep but it seems that NAPI for Queue 0 will clean
the RX path but as TX is in different NAPI, this last one is called at a
slower rate which kills performance in TX. I suspect this is due to TX
cleaning takes much longer than RX and because NAPI will get canceled
once we return with 0 budget consumed (e.g. when TX is still not done it
will return 0 budget).

Fix this by looking at all TX channels in NAPI poll function.

Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>
Fixes: 8fce33317023 ("net: stmmac: Rework coalesce timer and fix multi-queue races")
Cc: Joao Pinto <jpinto@...opsys.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h      |  1 -
 drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 11 +++++------
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
index 63e1064b27a2..8f6741a626d8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
@@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ struct stmmac_channel {
 	struct stmmac_priv *priv_data;
 	u32 index;
 	int has_rx;
-	int has_tx;
 };
 
 struct stmmac_tc_entry {
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
index 685d20472358..5bf5f8ebb4b6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
@@ -2031,13 +2031,13 @@ static int stmmac_napi_check(struct stmmac_priv *priv, u32 chan)
 	struct stmmac_channel *ch = &priv->channel[chan];
 	bool needs_work = false;
 
-	if ((status & handle_rx) && ch->has_rx) {
+	if (status & handle_rx) {
 		needs_work = true;
 	} else {
 		status &= ~handle_rx;
 	}
 
-	if ((status & handle_tx) && ch->has_tx) {
+	if (status & handle_tx) {
 		needs_work = true;
 	} else {
 		status &= ~handle_tx;
@@ -3528,11 +3528,12 @@ static int stmmac_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 	struct stmmac_priv *priv = ch->priv_data;
 	int work_done, rx_done = 0, tx_done = 0;
 	u32 chan = ch->index;
+	int i;
 
 	priv->xstats.napi_poll++;
 
-	if (ch->has_tx)
-		tx_done = stmmac_tx_clean(priv, budget, chan);
+	for (i = 0; i < priv->plat->tx_queues_to_use; i++)
+		tx_done += stmmac_tx_clean(priv, budget, i);
 	if (ch->has_rx)
 		rx_done = stmmac_rx(priv, budget, chan);
 
@@ -4325,8 +4326,6 @@ int stmmac_dvr_probe(struct device *device,
 
 		if (queue < priv->plat->rx_queues_to_use)
 			ch->has_rx = true;
-		if (queue < priv->plat->tx_queues_to_use)
-			ch->has_tx = true;
 
 		netif_napi_add(ndev, &ch->napi, stmmac_napi_poll,
 			       NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT);
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ