lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 13 Feb 2019 18:46:22 +0100
From:   Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] lib/libnetlink: ensure a minimum of 32KB for
 the buffer used in rtnl_recvmsg()

Hi Eric,

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 05:58:41PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> In the past, we tried to increase the buffer size up to 32 KB in order
> to reduce number of syscalls per dump.
> 
> Commit 2d34851cd341 ("lib/libnetlink: re malloc buff if size is not enough")
> brought the size back to 4KB because the kernel can not know the application
> is ready to receive bigger requests.
> 
> See kernel commits 9063e21fb026 ("netlink: autosize skb lengthes") and
> d35c99ff77ec ("netlink: do not enter direct reclaim from netlink_dump()")
> for more details.

Wouldn't it be better if the kernel recognized MSG_TRUNC and allocated a
buffer large enough to hold the full message in that case? I have no
idea how hard that would be to implement, but calling recvmsg() with
MSG_TRUNC set and not getting the full message length in return is not
quite what one expects after reading recvmsg(2).

Cheers, Phil

Powered by blists - more mailing lists