[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190213181323.GA708@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 19:13:23 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, alexandru.marginean@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] enetc: Add ENETC PF level external MDIO
support
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 01:02:23PM +0200, Claudiu Manoil wrote:
> Each ENETC PF has its own MDIO interface, the corresponding
> MDIO registers are mapped in the ENETC's Port register block.
> The current patch adds a driver for these PF level MDIO buses,
> so that each PF can manage directly its own external link.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile | 3 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_mdio.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c | 13 ++
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h | 6 +
> 4 files changed, 217 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_mdio.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> index 6976602..7139e41 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC) += fsl-enetc.o
> -fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC) += enetc.o enetc_cbdr.o enetc_ethtool.o
> +fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC) += enetc.o enetc_cbdr.o enetc_ethtool.o \
> + enetc_mdio.o
> fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_PCI_IOV) += enetc_msg.o
> fsl-enetc-objs := enetc_pf.o $(fsl-enetc-y)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_mdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_mdio.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e71b4fd
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_mdio.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-Clause)
> +/* Copyright 2019 NXP */
> +
> +#include <linux/mdio.h>
> +#include <linux/of_mdio.h>
> +
> +#include "enetc_pf.h"
> +
> +struct enetc_mdio_regs {
> + u32 mdio_cfg; /* MDIO configuration and status */
> + u32 mdio_ctl; /* MDIO control */
> + u32 mdio_data; /* MDIO data */
> + u32 mdio_addr; /* MDIO address */
> +};
> +
> +#define bus_to_enetc_regs(bus) (struct enetc_mdio_regs __iomem *)((bus)->priv)
> +
> +#define ENETC_MDIO_REG_OFFSET 0x1c00
> +#define ENETC_MDC_DIV 258
> +#define MDIO_CFG_CLKDIV(x) ((((x) >> 1) & 0xff) << 8)
> +#define MDIO_CFG_BSY BIT(0)
> +#define MDIO_CFG_RD_ER BIT(1)
> +#define MDIO_CFG_ENC BIT(6)
> +#define MDIO_CFG_NEG BIT(23)
> +#define MDIO_CTL_DEV_ADDR(x) ((x) & 0x1f)
> +#define MDIO_CTL_PORT_ADDR(x) (((x) & 0x1f) << 5)
> +#define MDIO_CTL_READ BIT(15)
> +#define MDIO_DATA(x) ((x) & 0xffff)
> +
> +#define TIMEOUT 1000
> +static int enetc_wait_complete(struct device *dev,
> + struct enetc_mdio_regs __iomem *regs)
> +{
> + unsigned int timeout;
> +
> + timeout = TIMEOUT;
> + while ((enetc_rd_reg(®s->mdio_cfg) & MDIO_CFG_BSY) && timeout) {
> + cpu_relax();
> + timeout--;
> + }
> +
> + if (!timeout) {
> + dev_err(dev, "timeout waiting for bus to be free\n");
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
Hi Claudiu
readx_poll_timeout()
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int enetc_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id, int regnum,
> + u16 value)
> +{
> + struct enetc_mdio_regs __iomem *regs = bus_to_enetc_regs(bus);
> + u32 mdio_ctl, mdio_cfg;
> + u16 dev_addr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + mdio_cfg = MDIO_CFG_CLKDIV(ENETC_MDC_DIV) | MDIO_CFG_NEG;
What does MDIO_CFG_NEG mean?
> + if (regnum & MII_ADDR_C45) {
> + /* clause 45 */
Does the comment add anything useful?
> + dev_addr = (regnum >> 16) & 0x1f;
> + mdio_cfg |= MDIO_CFG_ENC;
Maybe MDIO_CFG_ENC could be called MDIO_CFG_C45? Assuming that is what
it actually means?
> +int enetc_mdio_probe(struct enetc_pf *pf)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pf->si->pdev->dev;
> + struct enetc_mdio_regs __iomem *regs;
> + struct mii_bus *bus;
> + int ret;
> +
> + bus = mdiobus_alloc_size(sizeof(regs));
> + if (!bus)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + bus->name = "Freescale ENETC MDIO Bus";
> + bus->read = enetc_mdio_read;
> + bus->write = enetc_mdio_write;
> + bus->parent = dev;
> + snprintf(bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "%s", dev_name(dev));
> +
> + /* store the enetc mdio base address for this bus */
> + regs = pf->si->hw.port + ENETC_MDIO_REG_OFFSET;
> + bus->priv = regs;
> +
> + ret = of_mdiobus_register(bus, dev->of_node);
It is a good idea to have an mdio node which contains the list of
PHYs. You can get into odd situations if you don't do that.
>
> @@ -770,12 +771,23 @@ static int enetc_of_get_phy(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> priv->phy_node = of_node_get(np);
> }
>
> + if (!of_phy_is_fixed_link(np)) {
> + err = enetc_mdio_probe(pf);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "MDIO bus registration failed\n");
enetc_mdio_probe() already prints an error message. You don't really
need both.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists