[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190214074712.17846-9-vladbu@mellanox.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:47:08 +0200
From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
davem@...emloft.net, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 08/12] net: sched: flower: handle concurrent filter insertion in fl_change
Check if user specified a handle and another filter with the same handle
was inserted concurrently. Return EAGAIN to retry filter processing (in
case it is an overwrite request).
Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
---
net/sched/cls_flower.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_flower.c b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
index fc6371a9b0f9..114cb7876133 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_flower.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
@@ -1539,6 +1539,15 @@ static int fl_change(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *in_skb,
/* user specifies a handle and it doesn't exist */
err = idr_alloc_u32(&head->handle_idr, fnew, &handle,
handle, GFP_ATOMIC);
+
+ /* Filter with specified handle was concurrently
+ * inserted after initial check in cls_api. This is not
+ * necessarily an error if NLM_F_EXCL is not set in
+ * message flags. Returning EAGAIN will cause cls_api to
+ * try to update concurrently inserted rule.
+ */
+ if (err == -ENOSPC)
+ err = -EAGAIN;
} else {
handle = 1;
err = idr_alloc_u32(&head->handle_idr, fnew, &handle,
--
2.13.6
Powered by blists - more mailing lists