[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190214143907.3275-1-jiri@resnulli.us>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:39:07 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: [patch net-next] lib: objagg: fix handling of object with 0 users when assembling hints
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
It is possible that there might be an originally parent object with 0
direct users that is in hints no longer considered as parent. Then the
weight of this object is 0 and current code ignores him. That's why the
total amount of hint objects might be lower than for the original
objagg and WARN_ON is hit. Fix this be considering 0 weight valid.
Fixes: 9069a3817d82 ("lib: objagg: implement optimization hints assembly and use hints for object creation")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
---
lib/objagg.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/objagg.c b/lib/objagg.c
index d552ec9c60ed..576be22e86de 100644
--- a/lib/objagg.c
+++ b/lib/objagg.c
@@ -744,8 +744,6 @@ static unsigned int objagg_tmp_graph_node_weight(struct objagg_tmp_graph *graph,
* that this node can represent with delta.
*/
- if (node->crossed_out)
- return 0;
for (j = 0; j < graph->nodes_count; j++) {
if (!objagg_tmp_graph_is_edge(graph, index, j))
continue;
@@ -759,14 +757,18 @@ static unsigned int objagg_tmp_graph_node_weight(struct objagg_tmp_graph *graph,
static int objagg_tmp_graph_node_max_weight(struct objagg_tmp_graph *graph)
{
+ struct objagg_tmp_node *node;
unsigned int max_weight = 0;
unsigned int weight;
int max_index = -1;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < graph->nodes_count; i++) {
+ node = &graph->nodes[i];
+ if (node->crossed_out)
+ continue;
weight = objagg_tmp_graph_node_weight(graph, i);
- if (weight > max_weight) {
+ if (weight >= max_weight) {
max_weight = weight;
max_index = i;
}
--
2.14.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists