netdev - Re: [net-next, PATCH] net: stmmac: use correct define to get rx timestamp on GMAC4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a62c35de-7afa-14ec-5ca6-05bd61b6d09d@st.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Feb 2019 16:00:54 +0100
From:   Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
To:     Jose Abreu <jose.abreu@...opsys.com>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next, PATCH] net: stmmac: use correct define to get rx
 timestamp on GMAC4

Hi Jose

On 2/14/19 3:18 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
> 
> On 2/14/2019 2:12 PM, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>> In dwmac4_wrback_get_rx_timestamp_status we looking for a RX timestamp.
>> For that receive descriptors are handled and so we should use defines
>> related to receive descriptors. It'll no change the functional behavior
>> as RDES3_RDES1_VALID=TDES3_RS1V=BIT(26) but it makes code easier to read.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_descs.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_descs.c
>> index 20299f6..9f062b3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_descs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_descs.c
>> @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static int dwmac4_wrback_get_rx_timestamp_status(void *desc, void *next_desc,
>>   	int ret = -EINVAL;
>>   
>>   	/* Get the status from normal w/b descriptor */
>> -	if (likely(p->des3 & TDES3_RS1V)) {
>> +	if (likely(p->des3 & RDES3_RDES1_VALID)) {
> 
> Shouldn't this also use le32_to_cpu() like bellow ?

I agree. I focused on cosmetic but yes you are right, we have to take 
car about endianness as this IP is used by different processors (using 
different endianness). I gonna send a v2.
I think dwmac4_rx_check_timestamp have the same kind of issue. Another 
patch should be sent for it. no ?

regards
Alex



> 
> Thanks,
> Jose Miguel Abreu
> 
>>   		if (likely(le32_to_cpu(p->des1) & RDES1_TIMESTAMP_AVAILABLE)) {
>>   			int i = 0;
>>   
>>