netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: fix memory leak in bpf_lwt_xmit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 14 Feb 2019 11:28:16 -0800
From:   Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:     Peter Oskolkov <posk@...k.io>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: fix memory leak in bpf_lwt_xmit_reroute

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 11:10 AM David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/14/19 11:42 AM, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
> > I'll refactor the test as you suggest here
> > when I add VRF and GRO tests in a couple of weeks, if this is OK.
>
> IMO, the tests should go in with the feature, not a release later. If we
> are at -rc6 this week then you might get next week as well.
>
> The unreachable toggle is a fairly quick integration. GRO really should
> also get in the same cycle as the feature. Preferably VRF tests as well
> since you have the commands.

OK, I'll work on the negative tests and GRO first.

>
> The pretty printing cleanup can be done later.