[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190215074429.6890e47e@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 07:44:29 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
oss-drivers@...ronome.com, mkubecek@...e.cz, andrew@...n.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] nfp: devlink: allow flashing the device
via devlink
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 11:15:14 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > static const struct ethtool_ops nfp_net_ethtool_ops = {
>
> Why don't you use the compat fallback? I think you should.
You and Michal both asked the same so let me answer the first to ask :)
- if devlink is built as a module the fallback is not reachable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists