netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] bonding: check slave set command firstly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMDZJNUE7WwtotPdBpMV1Q0hfoMKXhErK6nF=sTHXoM6T_8vEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:44:58 +0800
From:   Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] bonding: check slave set command firstly

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 12:36 AM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com
> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:49:48 -0800
>
> > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
> >
> > This patch is a little improvement. If user use the
> > command shown as below, we should print the info [1]
> > instead of [2]. The eth0 exists actually, and it may
> > confuse user.
> >
> > $ echo "eth0" > /sys/class/net/bond4/bonding/slaves
> >
> > [1] "bond4: no command found in slaves file - use +ifname or -ifname"
> > [2] "write error: No such device"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
>
> Applied, but would you please fix the dates on your submissions?
>
> Because the dates in your patch postings are in the past, patchwork
> puts your work at the tail of my patch queue instead of the front.
OK, I format the patch a few days ago, but send it yesterday.
> Thank you.