[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190216200405.GB25057@otheros>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 21:04:05 +0100
From: Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@...3.blue>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
wkok@...ulusnetworks.com, anuradhak@...ulusnetworks.com,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] net: bridge: don't flood known multicast traffic
when snooping is enabled
Hi Nik, hi Ido,
By the way speaking about the IGMP/MLD querier mechanism. Not sure if
you are subscribed to the pim@...f.org or mcast-wifi@...f.org mailing lists.
There was a call for volunteers to progress IGMP/MLD to standards
track not that long ago:
"[pim] Volunteers needed for work on progressing IGMP/MLD on the standards track"
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/F5y_w6jnrtzBpEiC7F_TxBv9PXI
I had voiced some concerns regarding the IGMPv2/MLDv1 report
suppression and the querier mechanism and their unfavourable
implications, as well as some issues (or ambiguities at least) with RFC4541:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/DWWYpnsZsbqHtafwYZ_swhDpbcQ
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/omI4-pg-12vO88YuZcRP5TCz4wY
It seems that some bigger vendors had gathered for a phone call:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/jPAbf-PHgtgpwe8lgyjOzCHlhc0
But I haven't heard anything back from that meeting on those
lists.
Just wanted to forward this, in case you guys might maybe be
interested to participate there in some way. :-)
Cheers, Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists