lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190217230622.GI7443@krava>
Date:   Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:06:22 +0100
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, kernel-team@...com,
        peterz@...radead.org, acme@...hat.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
        namhyung@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 perf,bpf 10/11] perf, bpf: enable annotation of bpf
 program

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 01:53:53PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:

SNIP

>  int machine__process_bpf_event(struct machine *machine __maybe_unused,
>  			       union perf_event *event,
>  			       struct perf_sample *sample __maybe_unused)
>  {
>  	if (dump_trace)
>  		perf_event__fprintf_bpf_event(event, stdout);
> +
> +	switch (event->bpf_event.type) {
> +	case PERF_BPF_EVENT_PROG_LOAD:
> +		return machine__process_bpf_event_load(machine, event, sample);
> +
> +	case PERF_BPF_EVENT_PROG_UNLOAD:
> +		break;

could we make a comment here, descriving why we dont
remove bpf programs.. which I assume is intentional 

thanks,
jirka

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ