netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sgi: use GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190217.155206.75010948411009821.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Sun, 17 Feb 2019 15:52:06 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     weiyongjun1@...wei.com
Cc:     yang.wei9@....com.cn, mcgrof@...nel.org, yuehaibing@...wei.com,
        hch@....de, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sgi: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock

From: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 01:48:09 +0000

> The function meth_init_tx_ring() is called from meth_tx_timeout(),
> in which spin_lock is held, so we should use GFP_ATOMIC instead.
> 
> Fixes: 8d4c28fbc284 ("meth: pass struct device to DMA API functions")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>

Applied.