| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <E1gvPHw-0008OD-To@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 16:27:32 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] net: dsa: fix lockdep warning
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
4.20.0+ #302 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
systemd-udevd/160 is trying to acquire lock:
edea6080 (&chip->reg_lock){+.+.}, at: __setup_irq+0x640/0x704
but task is already holding lock:
edff0340 (&desc->request_mutex){+.+.}, at: __setup_irq+0xa0/0x704
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&desc->request_mutex){+.+.}:
mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
__setup_irq+0xa0/0x704
request_threaded_irq+0xd0/0x150
mv88e6xxx_probe+0x41c/0x694 [mv88e6xxx]
mdio_probe+0x2c/0x54
really_probe+0x200/0x2c4
driver_probe_device+0x5c/0x174
__driver_attach+0xd8/0xdc
bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x7c
bus_add_driver+0xe4/0x1f0
driver_register+0x7c/0x110
mdio_driver_register+0x24/0x58
do_one_initcall+0x74/0x2e8
do_init_module+0x60/0x1d0
load_module+0x1968/0x1ff4
sys_finit_module+0x8c/0x98
ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28
0xbedf2ae8
-> #0 (&chip->reg_lock){+.+.}:
__mutex_lock+0x50/0x8b8
mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
__setup_irq+0x640/0x704
request_threaded_irq+0xd0/0x150
mv88e6xxx_g2_irq_setup+0xcc/0x1b4 [mv88e6xxx]
mv88e6xxx_probe+0x44c/0x694 [mv88e6xxx]
mdio_probe+0x2c/0x54
really_probe+0x200/0x2c4
driver_probe_device+0x5c/0x174
__driver_attach+0xd8/0xdc
bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x7c
bus_add_driver+0xe4/0x1f0
driver_register+0x7c/0x110
mdio_driver_register+0x24/0x58
do_one_initcall+0x74/0x2e8
do_init_module+0x60/0x1d0
load_module+0x1968/0x1ff4
sys_finit_module+0x8c/0x98
ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28
0xbedf2ae8
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&desc->request_mutex);
lock(&chip->reg_lock);
lock(&desc->request_mutex);
lock(&chip->reg_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by systemd-udevd/160:
#0: ee040868 (&dev->mutex){....}, at: __driver_attach+0x70/0xdc
#1: edff0340 (&desc->request_mutex){+.+.}, at: __setup_irq+0xa0/0x704
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 160 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 4.20.0+ #302
Hardware name: Marvell Armada 380/385 (Device Tree)
[<c0019638>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0014888>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c0014888>] (show_stack) from [<c07f54e0>] (dump_stack+0x9c/0xd4)
[<c07f54e0>] (dump_stack) from [<c0088afc>] (print_circular_bug+0x284/0x2d8)
[<c0088afc>] (print_circular_bug) from [<c0086b5c>] (__lock_acquire+0x15d4/0x19b8)
[<c0086b5c>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c0087828>] (lock_acquire+0xc4/0x1dc)
[<c0087828>] (lock_acquire) from [<c080fd88>] (__mutex_lock+0x50/0x8b8)
[<c080fd88>] (__mutex_lock) from [<c0810678>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24)
[<c0810678>] (mutex_lock_nested) from [<c009e060>] (__setup_irq+0x640/0x704)
[<c009e060>] (__setup_irq) from [<c009e2e0>] (request_threaded_irq+0xd0/0x150)
[<c009e2e0>] (request_threaded_irq) from [<bf0ce978>] (mv88e6xxx_g2_irq_setup+0xcc/0x1b4 [mv88e6xxx])
[<bf0ce978>] (mv88e6xxx_g2_irq_setup [mv88e6xxx]) from [<bf0c7ab0>] (mv88e6xxx_probe+0x44c/0x694 [mv88e6xxx])
[<bf0c7ab0>] (mv88e6xxx_probe [mv88e6xxx]) from [<c050d420>] (mdio_probe+0x2c/0x54)
[<c050d420>] (mdio_probe) from [<c0496eac>] (really_probe+0x200/0x2c4)
[<c0496eac>] (really_probe) from [<c0497140>] (driver_probe_device+0x5c/0x174)
[<c0497140>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0497330>] (__driver_attach+0xd8/0xdc)
[<c0497330>] (__driver_attach) from [<c0495494>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x7c)
[<c0495494>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c04963d4>] (bus_add_driver+0xe4/0x1f0)
[<c04963d4>] (bus_add_driver) from [<c0498038>] (driver_register+0x7c/0x110)
[<c0498038>] (driver_register) from [<c050d338>] (mdio_driver_register+0x24/0x58)
[<c050d338>] (mdio_driver_register) from [<c000afdc>] (do_one_initcall+0x74/0x2e8)
[<c000afdc>] (do_one_initcall) from [<c00d4994>] (do_init_module+0x60/0x1d0)
[<c00d4994>] (do_init_module) from [<c00d39e0>] (load_module+0x1968/0x1ff4)
mvneta f1034000.ethernet eth2: requesting inband/2500base-x, 00200,0000a440
[<c00d39e0>] (load_module) from [<c00d4248>] (sys_finit_module+0x8c/0x98)
[<c00d4248>] (sys_finit_module) from [<c0009000>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28)
Exception stack(0xedfe5fa8 to 0xedfe5ff0)
5fa0: 00020000 00000000 0000000b b6f2a4b5 00000000 00b8fc70
5fc0: 00020000 00000000 00000000 0000017b 00b995a0 00020000 00000000 00b8fc70
5fe0: bedf2af8 bedf2ae8 b6f242ac b6e83d70
This is caused by the locking order inversion in mv88e6xxx_probe:
mutex_lock(&chip->reg_lock);
if (chip->irq > 0)
err = mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_setup(chip);
else
err = mv88e6xxx_irq_poll_setup(chip);
mutex_unlock(&chip->reg_lock);
Here, we take chip->reg_lock, and then call into mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_setup()
which then calls request_threaded_irq(), taking the request_mutex.
However, when we request the g2 interrupt, we call request_threaded_irq()
again, which takes the request_mutex, which then goes on to call
chip_bus_lock(). This comes through to mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_bus_lock,
which then tries to grab chip->reg_lock. This results in the two locks
being taken together in differing orders, provoking lockdep to warn.
Move the mutex_lock()/unlock() for reg_lock inside
mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_free_common() and mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_setup_common(), where
we actually access registers, thereby avoiding holding it while calling
request_threaded_irq() or setting up the delayed work.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
---
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
index 24fb6a685039..801442195a04 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
@@ -349,9 +349,11 @@ static void mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_free_common(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
int irq, virq;
u16 mask;
+ mutex_lock(&chip->reg_lock);
mv88e6xxx_g1_read(chip, MV88E6XXX_G1_CTL1, &mask);
mask &= ~GENMASK(chip->g1_irq.nirqs, 0);
mv88e6xxx_g1_write(chip, MV88E6XXX_G1_CTL1, mask);
+ mutex_unlock(&chip->reg_lock);
for (irq = 0; irq < chip->g1_irq.nirqs; irq++) {
virq = irq_find_mapping(chip->g1_irq.domain, irq);
@@ -369,9 +371,7 @@ static void mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_free(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
*/
free_irq(chip->irq, chip);
- mutex_lock(&chip->reg_lock);
mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_free_common(chip);
- mutex_unlock(&chip->reg_lock);
}
static int mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_setup_common(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
@@ -392,6 +392,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_setup_common(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
chip->g1_irq.chip = mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_chip;
chip->g1_irq.masked = ~0;
+ mutex_lock(&chip->reg_lock);
err = mv88e6xxx_g1_read(chip, MV88E6XXX_G1_CTL1, &mask);
if (err)
goto out_mapping;
@@ -406,6 +407,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_setup_common(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
err = mv88e6xxx_g1_read(chip, MV88E6XXX_G1_STS, ®);
if (err)
goto out_disable;
+ mutex_unlock(&chip->reg_lock);
return 0;
@@ -414,6 +416,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_setup_common(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
mv88e6xxx_g1_write(chip, MV88E6XXX_G1_CTL1, mask);
out_mapping:
+ mutex_unlock(&chip->reg_lock);
for (irq = 0; irq < 16; irq++) {
virq = irq_find_mapping(chip->g1_irq.domain, irq);
irq_dispose_mapping(virq);
@@ -479,9 +482,7 @@ static void mv88e6xxx_irq_poll_free(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
kthread_cancel_delayed_work_sync(&chip->irq_poll_work);
kthread_destroy_worker(chip->kworker);
- mutex_lock(&chip->reg_lock);
mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_free_common(chip);
- mutex_unlock(&chip->reg_lock);
}
int mv88e6xxx_wait(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int addr, int reg, u16 mask)
@@ -4718,12 +4719,10 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_probe(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
* the PHYs will link their interrupts to these interrupt
* controllers
*/
- mutex_lock(&chip->reg_lock);
if (chip->irq > 0)
err = mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_setup(chip);
else
err = mv88e6xxx_irq_poll_setup(chip);
- mutex_unlock(&chip->reg_lock);
if (err)
goto out;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists