lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 18 Feb 2019 12:21:32 +0100
From:   Maciej Fijalkowski <maciejromanfijalkowski@...il.com>
To:     Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>
Cc:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
        ast@...nel.org, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>,
        "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@...el.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        xiaolong.ye@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] libbpf: add support for using AF_XDP
 sockets

On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:59:30 +0100
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 6:09 PM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
> >
> > On 02/08/2019 02:05 PM, Magnus Karlsson wrote:  
> > > This commit adds AF_XDP support to libbpf. The main reason for this is
> > > to facilitate writing applications that use AF_XDP by offering
> > > higher-level APIs that hide many of the details of the AF_XDP
> > > uapi. This is in the same vein as libbpf facilitates XDP adoption by
> > > offering easy-to-use higher level interfaces of XDP
> > > functionality. Hopefully this will facilitate adoption of AF_XDP, make
> > > applications using it simpler and smaller, and finally also make it
> > > possible for applications to benefit from optimizations in the AF_XDP
> > > user space access code. Previously, people just copied and pasted the
> > > code from the sample application into their application, which is not
> > > desirable.
> > >
> > > The interface is composed of two parts:
> > >
> > > * Low-level access interface to the four rings and the packet
> > > * High-level control plane interface for creating and setting
> > >   up umems and af_xdp sockets as well as a simple XDP program.
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>  
> > [...]  
> > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..a982a76
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,742 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (LGPL-2.1 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * AF_XDP user-space access library.
> > > + *
> > > + * Copyright(c) 2018 - 2019 Intel Corporation.
> > > + *
> > > + * Author(s): Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <errno.h>
> > > +#include <stdlib.h>
> > > +#include <string.h>
> > > +#include <unistd.h>
> > > +#include <arpa/inet.h>
> > > +#include <asm/barrier.h>
> > > +#include <linux/compiler.h>
> > > +#include <linux/filter.h>
> > > +#include <linux/if_ether.h>
> > > +#include <linux/if_link.h>
> > > +#include <linux/if_packet.h>
> > > +#include <linux/if_xdp.h>
> > > +#include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
> > > +#include <net/if.h>
> > > +#include <sys/mman.h>
> > > +#include <sys/socket.h>
> > > +#include <sys/types.h>
> > > +
> > > +#include "bpf.h"
> > > +#include "libbpf.h"
> > > +#include "libbpf_util.h"
> > > +#include "nlattr.h"
> > > +#include "xsk.h"
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef SOL_XDP
> > > + #define SOL_XDP 283
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef AF_XDP
> > > + #define AF_XDP 44
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef PF_XDP
> > > + #define PF_XDP AF_XDP
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > +struct xsk_umem {
> > > +     struct xsk_ring_prod *fill;
> > > +     struct xsk_ring_cons *comp;
> > > +     char *umem_area;
> > > +     struct xsk_umem_config config;
> > > +     int fd;
> > > +     int refcount;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +struct xsk_socket {
> > > +     struct xsk_ring_cons *rx;
> > > +     struct xsk_ring_prod *tx;
> > > +     __u64 outstanding_tx;
> > > +     struct xsk_umem *umem;
> > > +     struct xsk_socket_config config;
> > > +     int fd;
> > > +     int xsks_map;
> > > +     int ifindex;
> > > +     int prog_fd;
> > > +     int qidconf_map_fd;
> > > +     int xsks_map_fd;
> > > +     __u32 queue_id;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +struct xsk_nl_info {
> > > +     bool xdp_prog_attached;
> > > +     int ifindex;
> > > +     int fd;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +#define MAX_QUEUES 128  
> >
> > Why is this a fixed constant here, shouldn't this be dynamic due to being NIC
> > specific anyway?  
> 
> It was only here for simplicity. If a NIC had more queues, it would
> require a recompile of the lib. Obviously, not desirable in a distro.
> What I could do is to read the max "combined" queues (pre-set maximum
> in the ethtool output) from the same interface as ethool uses and size
> the array after that. Or is there a simpler way? What to do if the NIC
> does not have a "combined", or is there no such NIC (seems the common
> HW ones set this)?
> 
> > [...]  
> > > +void *xsk_umem__get_data(struct xsk_umem *umem, __u64 addr)
> > > +{
> > > +     return &((char *)(umem->umem_area))[addr];
> > > +}  
> >
> > There's also a xsk_umem__get_data_raw() doing the same. Why having both, resp.
> > when to choose which? ;)  
> 
> There is enough to have the xsk_umem__get_data_raw() function.
> xsk_umem__get_data() is just a convenience function for which the
> application does not have to store the beginning of the umem. But as
> the application always has to provide this anyway in the
> xsk_umem__create() function, it might as well store this pointer. I
> will delete xsk_umem__get_data() and rename xsk_umem__get_data_raw()
> to xsk_umem__get_data().
> 
> > > +int xsk_umem__fd(const struct xsk_umem *umem)
> > > +{
> > > +     return umem ? umem->fd : -EINVAL;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int xsk_socket__fd(const struct xsk_socket *xsk)
> > > +{
> > > +     return xsk ? xsk->fd : -EINVAL;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static bool xsk_page_aligned(void *buffer)
> > > +{
> > > +     unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)buffer;
> > > +
> > > +     return !(addr & (getpagesize() - 1));
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void xsk_set_umem_config(struct xsk_umem_config *cfg,
> > > +                             const struct xsk_umem_config *usr_cfg)
> > > +{
> > > +     if (!usr_cfg) {
> > > +             cfg->fill_size = XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS;
> > > +             cfg->comp_size = XSK_RING_CONS__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS;
> > > +             cfg->frame_size = XSK_UMEM__DEFAULT_FRAME_SIZE;
> > > +             cfg->frame_headroom = XSK_UMEM__DEFAULT_FRAME_HEADROOM;
> > > +             return;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     cfg->fill_size = usr_cfg->fill_size;
> > > +     cfg->comp_size = usr_cfg->comp_size;
> > > +     cfg->frame_size = usr_cfg->frame_size;
> > > +     cfg->frame_headroom = usr_cfg->frame_headroom;  
> >
> > Just optional nit, might be a bit nicer to have it in this form:
> >
> >         cfg->fill_size = usr_cfg ? usr_cfg->fill_size :
> >                          XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS;  
> 
> I actually think the current form is clearer when there are multiple
> lines. If there was only one line, I would agree with you.
> 
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void xsk_set_xdp_socket_config(struct xsk_socket_config *cfg,
> > > +                                   const struct xsk_socket_config *usr_cfg)
> > > +{
> > > +     if (!usr_cfg) {
> > > +             cfg->rx_size = XSK_RING_CONS__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS;
> > > +             cfg->tx_size = XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS;
> > > +             cfg->libbpf_flags = 0;
> > > +             cfg->xdp_flags = 0;
> > > +             cfg->bind_flags = 0;
> > > +             return;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     cfg->rx_size = usr_cfg->rx_size;
> > > +     cfg->tx_size = usr_cfg->tx_size;
> > > +     cfg->libbpf_flags = usr_cfg->libbpf_flags;
> > > +     cfg->xdp_flags = usr_cfg->xdp_flags;
> > > +     cfg->bind_flags = usr_cfg->bind_flags;  
> >
> > (Ditto)
> >  
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int xsk_umem__create(struct xsk_umem **umem_ptr, void *umem_area, __u64 size,
> > > +                  struct xsk_ring_prod *fill, struct xsk_ring_cons *comp,
> > > +                  const struct xsk_umem_config *usr_config)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct xdp_mmap_offsets off;
> > > +     struct xdp_umem_reg mr;
> > > +     struct xsk_umem *umem;
> > > +     socklen_t optlen;
> > > +     void *map;
> > > +     int err;
> > > +
> > > +     if (!umem_area || !umem_ptr || !fill || !comp)
> > > +             return -EFAULT;
> > > +     if (!size && !xsk_page_aligned(umem_area))
> > > +             return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +     umem = calloc(1, sizeof(*umem));
> > > +     if (!umem)
> > > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > +     umem->fd = socket(AF_XDP, SOCK_RAW, 0);
> > > +     if (umem->fd < 0) {
> > > +             err = -errno;
> > > +             goto out_umem_alloc;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     umem->umem_area = umem_area;
> > > +     xsk_set_umem_config(&umem->config, usr_config);
> > > +
> > > +     mr.addr = (uintptr_t)umem_area;
> > > +     mr.len = size;
> > > +     mr.chunk_size = umem->config.frame_size;
> > > +     mr.headroom = umem->config.frame_headroom;
> > > +
> > > +     err = setsockopt(umem->fd, SOL_XDP, XDP_UMEM_REG, &mr, sizeof(mr));
> > > +     if (err) {
> > > +             err = -errno;
> > > +             goto out_socket;
> > > +     }
> > > +     err = setsockopt(umem->fd, SOL_XDP, XDP_UMEM_FILL_RING,
> > > +                      &umem->config.fill_size,
> > > +                      sizeof(umem->config.fill_size));
> > > +     if (err) {
> > > +             err = -errno;
> > > +             goto out_socket;
> > > +     }
> > > +     err = setsockopt(umem->fd, SOL_XDP, XDP_UMEM_COMPLETION_RING,
> > > +                      &umem->config.comp_size,
> > > +                      sizeof(umem->config.comp_size));
> > > +     if (err) {
> > > +             err = -errno;
> > > +             goto out_socket;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     optlen = sizeof(off);
> > > +     err = getsockopt(umem->fd, SOL_XDP, XDP_MMAP_OFFSETS, &off, &optlen);
> > > +     if (err) {
> > > +             err = -errno;
> > > +             goto out_socket;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     map = xsk_mmap(NULL, off.fr.desc +
> > > +                    umem->config.fill_size * sizeof(__u64),
> > > +                    PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_POPULATE,
> > > +                    umem->fd, XDP_UMEM_PGOFF_FILL_RING);
> > > +     if (map == MAP_FAILED) {
> > > +             err = -errno;
> > > +             goto out_socket;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     umem->fill = fill;
> > > +     fill->mask = umem->config.fill_size - 1;
> > > +     fill->size = umem->config.fill_size;
> > > +     fill->producer = map + off.fr.producer;
> > > +     fill->consumer = map + off.fr.consumer;
> > > +     fill->ring = map + off.fr.desc;
> > > +     fill->cached_cons = umem->config.fill_size;
> > > +
> > > +     map = xsk_mmap(NULL,
> > > +                    off.cr.desc + umem->config.comp_size * sizeof(__u64),
> > > +                    PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_POPULATE,
> > > +                    umem->fd, XDP_UMEM_PGOFF_COMPLETION_RING);
> > > +     if (map == MAP_FAILED) {
> > > +             err = -errno;
> > > +             goto out_mmap;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     umem->comp = comp;
> > > +     comp->mask = umem->config.comp_size - 1;
> > > +     comp->size = umem->config.comp_size;
> > > +     comp->producer = map + off.cr.producer;
> > > +     comp->consumer = map + off.cr.consumer;
> > > +     comp->ring = map + off.cr.desc;
> > > +
> > > +     *umem_ptr = umem;
> > > +     return 0;
> > > +
> > > +out_mmap:
> > > +     munmap(umem->fill,
> > > +            off.fr.desc + umem->config.fill_size * sizeof(__u64));
> > > +out_socket:
> > > +     close(umem->fd);
> > > +out_umem_alloc:
> > > +     free(umem);
> > > +     return err;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int xsk_parse_nl(void *cookie, void *msg, struct nlattr **tb)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct nlattr *tb_parsed[IFLA_XDP_MAX + 1];
> > > +     struct xsk_nl_info *nl_info = cookie;
> > > +     struct ifinfomsg *ifinfo = msg;
> > > +     unsigned char mode;
> > > +     int err;
> > > +
> > > +     if (nl_info->ifindex && nl_info->ifindex != ifinfo->ifi_index)
> > > +             return 0;
> > > +
> > > +     if (!tb[IFLA_XDP])
> > > +             return 0;
> > > +
> > > +     err = libbpf_nla_parse_nested(tb_parsed, IFLA_XDP_MAX, tb[IFLA_XDP],
> > > +                                   NULL);
> > > +     if (err)
> > > +             return err;
> > > +
> > > +     if (!tb_parsed[IFLA_XDP_ATTACHED] || !tb_parsed[IFLA_XDP_FD])
> > > +             return 0;
> > > +
> > > +     mode = libbpf_nla_getattr_u8(tb_parsed[IFLA_XDP_ATTACHED]);
> > > +     if (mode == XDP_ATTACHED_NONE)
> > > +             return 0;
> > > +
> > > +     nl_info->xdp_prog_attached = true;
> > > +     nl_info->fd = libbpf_nla_getattr_u32(tb_parsed[IFLA_XDP_FD]);  
> >
> > Hm, I don't think this works if I read the intention of this helper correctly.
> >
> > IFLA_XDP_FD is never set for retrieving the prog from the kernel. So the
> > above is a bug.
> >
> > We also have bpf_get_link_xdp_id(). This should probably just be reused in
> > this context here.  
> 
> If bpf_get_link_xdp_id() will fit my bill, I will happily use it. I
> will check it out and hopefully I can drop all this code. Thanks.
>
I see that all you need to know is whether there's already attached XDP program
to xsk socket's related interface, no?
If so, then within the xsk_setup_xdp_prog, you could do something like:

	u32 prog_id = 0;

	bpf_get_link_xdp_id(xsk->ifindex, &prog_id, xsk->config.xdp_flags);
	if (!prog_id) {
		// create maps
		// load xdp prog
	} else {
		xsk->fd = prog_id;
	}

	xsk_update_bpf_maps(xsk, true, xsk->fd);

If that's ok then xsk_xdp_prog_attached and xsk_parse_nl could be dropped.

> > > +     return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static bool xsk_xdp_prog_attached(struct xsk_socket *xsk)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct xsk_nl_info nl_info;
> > > +     unsigned int nl_pid;
> > > +     char err_buf[256];
> > > +     int sock, err;
> > > +
> > > +     sock = libbpf_netlink_open(&nl_pid);
> > > +     if (sock < 0)
> > > +             return false;
> > > +
> > > +     nl_info.xdp_prog_attached = false;
> > > +     nl_info.ifindex = xsk->ifindex;
> > > +     nl_info.fd = -1;
> > > +
> > > +     err = libbpf_nl_get_link(sock, nl_pid, xsk_parse_nl, &nl_info);
> > > +     if (err) {
> > > +             libbpf_strerror(err, err_buf, sizeof(err_buf));
> > > +             pr_warning("Error:\n%s\n", err_buf);
> > > +             close(sock);
> > > +             return false;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     close(sock);
> > > +     xsk->prog_fd = nl_info.fd;
> > > +     return nl_info.xdp_prog_attached;
> > > +}  
> >
> > (See bpf_get_link_xdp_id().)
> >  
> > > +
> > > +static int xsk_load_xdp_prog(struct xsk_socket *xsk)
> > > +{
> > > +     char bpf_log_buf[BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE];
> > > +     int err, prog_fd;
> > > +
> > > +     /* This is the C-program:
> > > +      * SEC("xdp_sock") int xdp_sock_prog(struct xdp_md *ctx)
> > > +      * {
> > > +      *     int *qidconf, index = ctx->rx_queue_index;  
> > [...]  
> > > +
> > > +int xsk_socket__create(struct xsk_socket **xsk_ptr, const char *ifname,
> > > +                    __u32 queue_id, struct xsk_umem *umem,
> > > +                    struct xsk_ring_cons *rx, struct xsk_ring_prod *tx,
> > > +                    const struct xsk_socket_config *usr_config)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct sockaddr_xdp sxdp = {};
> > > +     struct xdp_mmap_offsets off;
> > > +     struct xsk_socket *xsk;
> > > +     socklen_t optlen;
> > > +     void *map;
> > > +     int err;
> > > +
> > > +     if (!umem || !xsk_ptr || !rx || !tx)
> > > +             return -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > +     if (umem->refcount) {
> > > +             pr_warning("Error: shared umems not supported by libbpf.\n");
> > > +             return -EBUSY;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     xsk = calloc(1, sizeof(*xsk));
> > > +     if (!xsk)
> > > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > +     if (umem->refcount++ > 0) {  
> >
> > Should this refcount rather be atomic actually?  
> 
> Neither our config nor data plane interfaces are reentrant for
> performance reasons. Any concurrency has to be handled explicitly on
> the application level. This so that it only penalizes apps that really
> need this.
> 
> Thanks for all your reviews: Magnus
> 
> > > +             xsk->fd = socket(AF_XDP, SOCK_RAW, 0);
> > > +             if (xsk->fd < 0) {
> > > +                     err = -errno;
> > > +                     goto out_xsk_alloc;
> > > +             }
> > > +     } else {
> > > +             xsk->fd = umem->fd;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     xsk->outstanding_tx = 0;
> > > +     xsk->queue_id = queue_id;
> > > +     xsk->umem = umem;
> > > +     xsk->ifindex = if_nametoindex(ifname);
> > > +     if (!xsk->ifindex) {
> > > +             err = -errno;
> > > +             goto out_socket;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     xsk_set_xdp_socket_config(&xsk->config, usr_config);  
> > [...]  

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ