netdev - [PATCH bpf-next] bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190219185417.145696-1-sdf@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Feb 2019 10:54:17 -0800
From:   Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf/test_run: fix unkillable BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN for
 flow dissector

Syzbot found out that running BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with repeat=0xffffffff
makes process unkillable. The problem is that when CONFIG_PREEMPT is
enabled, we never see need_resched() return true. This is due to the
fact that preempt_enable() (which we do in bpf_test_run_one on each
iteration) now handles resched if it's needed.

Let's disable preemption for the whole run, not per test. In this case
we can properly see whether resched is needed.
Let's also properly return -EINTR to the userspace in case of a signal
interrupt.

This is a follow up for a recently fixed issue in bpf_test_run, see
commit df1a2cb7c74b ("bpf/test_run: fix unkillable
BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN").

Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
---
 net/bpf/test_run.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 2c5172b33209..619655db8d9e 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -293,31 +293,45 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 	if (!repeat)
 		repeat = 1;
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	preempt_disable();
 	time_start = ktime_get_ns();
 	for (i = 0; i < repeat; i++) {
-		preempt_disable();
-		rcu_read_lock();
 		retval = __skb_flow_bpf_dissect(prog, skb,
 						&flow_keys_dissector,
 						&flow_keys);
-		rcu_read_unlock();
-		preempt_enable();
+
+		if (signal_pending(current)) {
+			preempt_enable();
+			rcu_read_unlock();
+
+			ret = -EINTR;
+			goto out;
+		}
 
 		if (need_resched()) {
-			if (signal_pending(current))
-				break;
 			time_spent += ktime_get_ns() - time_start;
+			preempt_enable();
+			rcu_read_unlock();
+
 			cond_resched();
+
+			rcu_read_lock();
+			preempt_disable();
 			time_start = ktime_get_ns();
 		}
 	}
 	time_spent += ktime_get_ns() - time_start;
+	preempt_enable();
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
 	do_div(time_spent, repeat);
 	duration = time_spent > U32_MAX ? U32_MAX : (u32)time_spent;
 
 	ret = bpf_test_finish(kattr, uattr, &flow_keys, sizeof(flow_keys),
 			      retval, duration);
 
+out:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
 	kfree(sk);
 	return ret;
-- 
2.21.0.rc0.258.g878e2cd30e-goog