netdev - Re: [tipc-discussion][net 1/1] tipc: fix race condition causing hung sendto

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190219.132132.1441357188232859482.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:21:32 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     tung.q.nguyen@...tech.com.au
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [tipc-discussion][net 1/1] tipc: fix race condition causing
 hung sendto

From: Tung Nguyen <tung.q.nguyen@...tech.com.au>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 14:03:10 +0700

> When sending multicast messages via blocking socket,
> if sending link is congested (tsk->cong_link_cnt is set to 1),
> the sending thread will be put into sleeping state. However,
> tipc_sk_filter_rcv() is called under socket spin lock but
> tipc_wait_for_cond() is not. So, there is no guarantee that
> the setting of tsk->cong_link_cnt to 0 in tipc_sk_proto_rcv() in
> CPU-1 will be perceived by CPU-0. If that is the case, the sending
> thread in CPU-0 after being waken up, will continue to see
> tsk->cong_link_cnt as 1 and put the sending thread into sleeping
> state again. The sending thread will sleep forever.
 ...
> This commit fixes it by adding memory barrier to tipc_sk_proto_rcv()
> and tipc_wait_for_cond().
> 
> Acked-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tung Nguyen <tung.q.nguyen@...tech.com.au>

You really need to build test this stuff properly:

net/tipc/socket.c: In function ‘__tipc_shutdown’:
./include/linux/wait.h:1119:2: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
  struct wait_queue_entry name = {     \
  ^~~~~~

You can't put the smp_rmb(); before the DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC() in that
basic block.