netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: check that BPF programs run with preemption disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <28b8b7dc-6bc5-2982-3e57-a121dbe30873@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:58:48 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, jannh@...gle.com, paulmck@...ux.ibm.com,
        will.deacon@....com, mingo@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: check that BPF programs run with preemption
 disabled

On 01/31/2019 11:29 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 01/29/2019 02:21 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>>
>> Introduce cant_sleep() macro for annotation of functions that cannot sleep.
>>
>> Use it in BPF_PROG_RUN to catch execution of BPF programs
>> in preemptable context.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> 
> (Just fyi, will let this sit in patchwork till the preemption fixes have been
> merged back from bpf into bpf-next as otherwise people will yell that they
> hit this frequently.)

Pushed out now, thanks!