[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190220193141.16498-3-idosch@mellanox.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 19:32:14 +0000
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
To: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>, mlxsw <mlxsw@...lanox.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 02/10] mlxsw: spectrum_buffers: Allocate prs & pms
dynamically
From: Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>
Spectrum-2 will be configured with a different set of pools than
Spectrum-1. The size of prs and pms buffers will therefore depend on the
chip type of the device.
Therefore, instead of reserving an array directly in a structure
definition, allocate the buffer in mlxsw_sp_sb_port{,s}_init().
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
---
.../mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_buffers.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_buffers.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_buffers.c
index cd23ec9268bc..7fa291ebcddf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_buffers.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_buffers.c
@@ -63,11 +63,11 @@ static const struct mlxsw_sp_sb_pool_des mlxsw_sp_sb_pool_dess[] = {
struct mlxsw_sp_sb_port {
struct mlxsw_sp_sb_cm ing_cms[MLXSW_SP_SB_ING_TC_COUNT];
struct mlxsw_sp_sb_cm eg_cms[MLXSW_SP_SB_EG_TC_COUNT];
- struct mlxsw_sp_sb_pm pms[MLXSW_SP_SB_POOL_DESS_LEN];
+ struct mlxsw_sp_sb_pm *pms;
};
struct mlxsw_sp_sb {
- struct mlxsw_sp_sb_pr prs[MLXSW_SP_SB_POOL_DESS_LEN];
+ struct mlxsw_sp_sb_pr *prs;
struct mlxsw_sp_sb_port *ports;
u32 cell_size;
u64 sb_size;
@@ -283,20 +283,68 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_port_headroom_init(struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port)
return mlxsw_sp_port_pb_prio_init(mlxsw_sp_port);
}
+static int mlxsw_sp_sb_port_init(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
+ struct mlxsw_sp_sb_port *sb_port)
+{
+ struct mlxsw_sp_sb_pm *pms;
+
+ pms = kcalloc(MLXSW_SP_SB_POOL_DESS_LEN, sizeof(*pms), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pms)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ sb_port->pms = pms;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void mlxsw_sp_sb_port_fini(struct mlxsw_sp_sb_port *sb_port)
+{
+ kfree(sb_port->pms);
+}
+
static int mlxsw_sp_sb_ports_init(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp)
{
unsigned int max_ports = mlxsw_core_max_ports(mlxsw_sp->core);
+ struct mlxsw_sp_sb_pr *prs;
+ int i;
+ int err;
mlxsw_sp->sb->ports = kcalloc(max_ports,
sizeof(struct mlxsw_sp_sb_port),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!mlxsw_sp->sb->ports)
return -ENOMEM;
+
+ prs = kcalloc(MLXSW_SP_SB_POOL_DESS_LEN, sizeof(*prs), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!prs) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_alloc_prs;
+ }
+ mlxsw_sp->sb->prs = prs;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < max_ports; i++) {
+ err = mlxsw_sp_sb_port_init(mlxsw_sp, &mlxsw_sp->sb->ports[i]);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_sb_port_init;
+ }
+
return 0;
+
+err_sb_port_init:
+ for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
+ mlxsw_sp_sb_port_fini(&mlxsw_sp->sb->ports[i]);
+ kfree(mlxsw_sp->sb->prs);
+err_alloc_prs:
+ kfree(mlxsw_sp->sb->ports);
+ return err;
}
static void mlxsw_sp_sb_ports_fini(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp)
{
+ int max_ports = mlxsw_core_max_ports(mlxsw_sp->core);
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = max_ports - 1; i >= 0; i--)
+ mlxsw_sp_sb_port_fini(&mlxsw_sp->sb->ports[i]);
+ kfree(mlxsw_sp->sb->prs);
kfree(mlxsw_sp->sb->ports);
}
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists