netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 12/12] net: sched: flower: set unlocked flag for flower proto ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM_iQpXTw3MsrT=C3rotH6hppVY6gi9KE7JARRayf7WZPz97zg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:36:45 -0800
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 12/12] net: sched: flower: set unlocked flag for
 flower proto ops

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 2:15 AM Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon 18 Feb 2019 at 19:27, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:47 PM Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Set TCF_PROTO_OPS_DOIT_UNLOCKED for flower classifier to indicate that its
> >> ops callbacks don't require caller to hold rtnl lock.
> >
> > So, if this means RTNL is gone for all cls_flower changes, why
> > do I still see rtnl_lock() in cls_flower.c after all your patches in
> > this set?
>
> It doesn't say that rtnl lock is gone, what it says is that caller
> doesn't have to obtain rtnl lock before calling flower ops callbacks.

So RTNL lock is still a bottle neck after all of these patches,
isn't it? :)

Yeah, please kindly add an explanation for why RTNL lock is still
here.

Thanks.