netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the bpf tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:03:05 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the bpf tree

Hi Stanislav,

On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:45:46 -0800 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> OTOH, I don't understand why is there a conflict? bpf and bpf-next
> adding tests in the same place/file? Those can be trivially resolved
> when bpf and bpf-next are merged in the next window.

Yes, and yes :-)

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped