[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190220102327.lq2zyqups2fso75z@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 18:23:27 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
syzbot <syzbot+bc5ab0af2dbf3b0ae897@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in br_mdb_ip_get
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 09:28:36AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
> > Weird, this is the kfree() on the error path of br_multicast_new_group()
> > when rhashtable_lookup_insert_fast() fails, which means the entry should
> > not be linked in the rhashtable or the hlist.
> > All other frees are via kfree_rcu. I'll keep looking..
>
> Humm.... +rhashtable.c maintianers
>
> The code in br_multicast_new_group is effectively:
>
> mp = kzalloc(sizeof(*mp), GFP_ATOMIC);
> err = rhashtable_lookup_insert_fast(&br->mdb_hash_tbl, &mp->rhnode,
> br_mdb_rht_params);
> if (err)
> kfree(mp);
>
> So it looks like rhashtable_lookup_insert_fast both returned an error
> and left the new object linked in the table. Since it happened only
> once, it may have something to do with concurrent resizing/shrinking.
I've looked through the rhashtable code in question and everything
looks OK. So I suspect some earlier corruption has occured to cause
this anomalous result. Is it possible to collect earlier alloc/free
stack traces on the object in question?
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists