[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190221175232.GM11489@garbanzo.do-not-panic.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:52:32 -0800
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Fix proc_do_large_bitmap for large input buffers
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:47:49AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 2/21/19 9:18 AM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 05:35:04PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >> Here's a pretty hacky test script to test this code via
> >> ip_local_reserved_ports
> >
> > Thanks Eric!
> >
> > So /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports is a production knob, and
> > if we wanted to stress test it with a selftest it could break other self
> > tests or change the system behaviour. Because of this we have now have
> > lib/test_sysctl.c, and we test this with the script:
> >
> > tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh
> >
> > Any chance you can extend lib/test_sysctl.c with a new respective bitmap
> > knob,
>
> Done
Thanks!
> > and add a respective test? This will ensure we don't regress
> > later. 0-day runs sysctl.sh so it should catch any regressions in the
> > future.
>
> As you know, learning somebody else's test harness infra is a PITA. ;)
> Can you find me off-list and give me a hand with this?
Sure, its actually quite simple, just as root, run the script.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists