[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1550707652-14747-2-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 19:07:31 -0500
From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 1/2] bnxt_en: Fix typo in firmware message timeout logic.
The logic that polls for the firmware message response uses a shorter
sleep interval for the first few passes. But there was a typo so it
was using the wrong counter (larger counter) for these short sleep
passes. The result is a slightly shorter timeout period for these
firmware messages than intended. Fix it by using the proper counter.
Fixes: 9751e8e71487 ("bnxt_en: reduce timeout on initial HWRM calls")
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
index 8bc7e49..1ddd672 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -3903,7 +3903,7 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_do_send_msg(struct bnxt *bp, void *msg, u32 msg_len,
if (len)
break;
/* on first few passes, just barely sleep */
- if (i < DFLT_HWRM_CMD_TIMEOUT)
+ if (i < HWRM_SHORT_TIMEOUT_COUNTER)
usleep_range(HWRM_SHORT_MIN_TIMEOUT,
HWRM_SHORT_MAX_TIMEOUT);
else
--
2.5.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists