lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190221163627.7b8aa2ce@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Feb 2019 16:36:27 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] xdp: Always use a devmap for XDP_REDIRECT
 to a device

On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 12:56:54 +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index b63bc77af2d1..629661db36ee 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -7527,6 +7527,12 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
>  			prog->dst_needed = 1;
>  		if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32)
>  			bpf_user_rnd_init_once();
> +		if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_redirect) {
> +			int err = dev_map_alloc_default_map();
> +
> +			if (err)
> +				return err;
> +		}
>  		if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_override_return)
>  			prog->kprobe_override = 1;
>  		if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_tail_call) {

> +int dev_map_alloc_default_map(void)
> +{
> +	struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
> +	struct bpf_dtab *dtab, *old_dtab;
> +	struct net_device *netdev;
> +	union bpf_attr attr = {};
> +	u32 idx;
> +	int err;

BPF programs don't obey by netns boundaries.  The fact the program is
verified in one ns doesn't mean this is the only ns it will be used in :(
Meaning if any program is using the redirect map you may need a secret
map in every ns.. no?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ