lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 22 Feb 2019 09:46:52 +0100
From:   Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
To:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2] bpf: test_bpf: turn of preemption in function __run_once

When running BPF test suite the following splat occurs:

[  415.930950] test_bpf: #0 TAX jited:0
[  415.931067] BUG: assuming atomic context at lib/test_bpf.c:6674
[  415.946169] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 11556, name: modprobe
[  415.953176] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[  415.957207] CPU: 1 PID: 11556 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G        W         5.0.0-rc7-next-20190220 #1
[  415.966328] Hardware name: HiKey Development Board (DT)
[  415.971592] Call trace:
[  415.974069]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x160
[  415.977761]  show_stack+0x24/0x30
[  415.981104]  dump_stack+0xc8/0x114
[  415.984534]  __cant_sleep+0xf0/0x108
[  415.988145]  test_bpf_init+0x5e0/0x1000 [test_bpf]
[  415.992971]  do_one_initcall+0x90/0x428
[  415.996837]  do_init_module+0x60/0x1e4
[  416.000614]  load_module+0x1de0/0x1f50
[  416.004391]  __se_sys_finit_module+0xc8/0xe0
[  416.008691]  __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x24/0x30
[  416.013255]  el0_svc_common+0x78/0x130
[  416.017031]  el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78
[  416.020806]  el0_svc+0x8/0xc

Rework so that preemption is disabled when we loop over function
'BPF_PROG_RUN(...)'.
Commit 568f196756ad ("bpf: check that BPF programs run with preemption disabled")
highlighted the issue.

Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
---
 lib/test_bpf.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index f3e570722a7e..0845f635f404 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -6668,12 +6668,14 @@ static int __run_one(const struct bpf_prog *fp, const void *data,
 	u64 start, finish;
 	int ret = 0, i;
 
+	preempt_disable();
 	start = ktime_get_ns();
 
 	for (i = 0; i < runs; i++)
 		ret = BPF_PROG_RUN(fp, data);
 
 	finish = ktime_get_ns();
+	preempt_enable();
 
 	*duration = finish - start;
 	do_div(*duration, runs);
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists