[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190223164357.17284-3-andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 17:43:57 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Release lock while requesting IRQ
There is no need to hold the register lock while requesting the GPIO
interrupt. By not holding it we can also avoid a false positive
lockdep splat.
Reported-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
---
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
index 7ee8607bf3a6..9cb17d3ef590 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
@@ -456,10 +456,12 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_setup(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
*/
irq_set_lockdep_class(chip->irq, &lock_key, &request_key);
+ mutex_unlock(&chip->reg_lock);
err = request_threaded_irq(chip->irq, NULL,
mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_thread_fn,
IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED,
dev_name(chip->dev), chip);
+ mutex_lock(&chip->reg_lock);
if (err)
mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_free_common(chip);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists