lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 24 Feb 2019 05:33:40 +0000
From:   Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@....com>
To:     Hayakawa Yutaro <yhayakawa3720subscribe@...il.com>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: kTLS getsockopt TLS_RX support



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hayakawa Yutaro <yhayakawa3720subscribe@...il.com>
> Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2019 11:01 AM
> To: Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@....com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: kTLS getsockopt TLS_RX support
> 
> 
> > 2019/02/24 10:50、Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@....com>のメール:
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org <netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org>
> On
> >> Behalf Of Hayakawa Yutaro
> >> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2019 10:59 PM
> >> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> >> Subject: kTLS getsockopt TLS_RX support
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> While trying the kTLS, I found out that currently, there is no
> >> support for kTLS getsockopt TLS_RX which extracts receive side crypto
> >> information from kTLS socket. Since setting crypto information for RX
> >> side is supported, I felt wonder why it is not supported.
> >>
> >> Is there any particular reason for it?
> >
> > What use case do you have in mind?
> > Why give back state of record layer which also contains (record sequence
> number) to user space?
> 
> I’d like to checkpoint/restore the TLS session in conjunction with
> TCP_REPAIR.
> 
> When we checkpoint the kTLS session, we need to pick the record sequence
> number or any other session information from kernel. For TX side, it is
> already supported (getsockopt TLS_TX), so I’m wondering why RX side is
> missing.
> 
> Is there any technical difficulty or it will never supported in future?

Don't think so. 
Will you submit a patch?

> Regards,
> Yutaro
> 
> >
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Yutaro

Powered by blists - more mailing lists