[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190225135618.5687e4c2@elisabeth>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 13:56:18 +0100
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] selftests: pmtu: add explicit tests for PMTU
exceptions cleanup
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 13:33:30 +0100
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net> wrote:
> 2019-02-25, 12:13:46 +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > + if ! timeout 1 ${ns_a} ip link del dev veth_A-R1; then
>
> That doesn't work. "ip link del" is stuck in a way that timeout can't
> terminate it, so this is still going to hang. Did you actually test
> this? :/
Indeed, upon actual testing, this hangs and the error is not reported.
> > + err " can't delete veth device in a timely
> > manner, PMTU dst likely leaked"
> > + return 1
> > + fi
> > + return 0
> > +}
You can use a subshell here, something like:
${ns_a} ip link del dev veth_A-R1 &
iplink_pid=$!
sleep 1
if [ "$(cat /proc/${iplink_pid}/cmdline 2>/dev/null | tr -d '\0')" = "iplinkdeldevveth_A-R1" ]; then
err " can't delete veth device in a timely manner, PMTU dst likely leaked"
return 1
fi
}
and now that I tried to run as a single test and couldn't find it, I
think it would also be worth it to rename the tests to something more
sensible.
Right now you have test_pmtu_ipv6_exception_cleanup() calling
test_cleanup_...(), I think it's confusing. Just call the test
test_cleanup_ipv6_exception(), it doesn't have so much to do with PMTU
anyway.
--
Stefano
Powered by blists - more mailing lists