netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2] net: sock: undefine SOCK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190225.151102.1890723208809034215.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 25 Feb 2019 15:11:02 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     xiyou.wangcong@...il.com
Cc:     laoar.shao@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
        joe@...ches.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, shaoyafang@...iglobal.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2] net: sock: undefine SOCK_DEBUGGING

From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:58:36 -0800

> So you agree that I can add debugging printk's only for my own use?

Let's put it this way.

If I ignore the fact that some of the data centers with the furtest
reach on the entire planet use something that is in the tree already,
then I am being unreasonable and insensitive.

This means no adding, but keeping things we already have.

Don't try to weasel word what I'm trying to say here Cong.

Have a nice day.