netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2] net: sock: undefine SOCK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM_iQpWYcu1NZ2mm65tkdPfaTtgL_skA=GnMnAUrwunATT63HA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Feb 2019 15:18:01 -0800
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        shaoyafang@...iglobal.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2] net: sock: undefine SOCK_DEBUGGING

(Cc'ing LKML)

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:11 PM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:58:36 -0800
>
> > Please be specific, and ideally make it a formal doc in netdev-FAQ.txt.
>
> And this isn't happening either Cong, I reserve the right to apply my
> judgment as networking maintainer on a case by case basis as I so see
> fit.

Thanks for rephrasing non-transparency in such a wonderful way.